http://endmtr.com/2008/04/01/two-sides-to-every-candidate/ Working to 'Write' a Wrong Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:40:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://endmtr.com/2008/04/01/two-sides-to-every-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-73 bluemountainmama Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:37:29 +0000 http://endmtr.com/?p=57#comment-73 i'm with you.... none of them are good choices to me. i'm a ron paul girl, but we all know the probability of him getting elected. but he has stated that no person has the right to do something on their property that pollutes their neighbors property.... and if they do, they should be prosecuted in court. i’m with you…. none of them are good choices to me. i’m a ron paul girl, but we all know the probability of him getting elected. but he has stated that no person has the right to do something on their property that pollutes their neighbors property…. and if they do, they should be prosecuted in court.

]]> http://endmtr.com/2008/04/01/two-sides-to-every-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-71 Denny Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:42:25 +0000 http://endmtr.com/?p=57#comment-71 Excellent post- I heard something a while back - a person was talking about the elections and said something to the effect that they were a one issue voter this election - same here. To be honest for me the choice is none of the above. I hear good things and then almost in the same breath I hear contradictory statements. Any mention of support for clean coal technology by any candidate disqualifies them in my book. That is a prime example of simply telling the people what they want to hear regardless of the actual facts. The sad part is - people believe it. Excellent post- I heard something a while back – a person was talking about the elections and said something to the effect that they were a one issue voter this election – same here. To be honest for me the choice is none of the above. I hear good things and then almost in the same breath I hear contradictory statements. Any mention of support for clean coal technology by any candidate disqualifies them in my book. That is a prime example of simply telling the people what they want to hear regardless of the actual facts. The sad part is – people believe it.

]]> http://endmtr.com/2008/04/01/two-sides-to-every-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-70 Shirley Stewart Burns Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:30:23 +0000 http://endmtr.com/?p=57#comment-70 Seems to me that they will each say whatever they have to in order to be elected. That message will change depending on where they are at and which way the wind is blowing. I want to see *real* plans for ending MTR, not just a few words thrown here and there. There really is no in-between here. Which Side Are You On? *that* is the question for all of the candidates. Are you for sustainable communities, healthy w/mountaintops; or for environmental devastation and obliteration of coalfield communities. Seems to me that they will each say whatever they have to in order to be elected. That message will change depending on where they are at and which way the wind is blowing. I want to see *real* plans for ending MTR, not just a few words thrown here and there. There really is no in-between here. Which Side Are You On? *that* is the question for all of the candidates. Are you for sustainable communities, healthy w/mountaintops; or for environmental devastation and obliteration of coalfield communities.

]]>