An article in Sunday’s Charleston Gazette headlined, “UMW taking up mountaintop fight? Union won’t oppose a ban, official says.” I read this article with particular interest and enthusiasm. When I was writing my dissertation/book about MTR, I devoted a chapter to the UMWA and its part in the coalfields. I noted the historical role that the UMWA had played in communities, often banding with local residents (miners and non-miners alike) to ensure safe living and working conditions. When the Union formed an unholy alliance with MTR workers, it compromised its traditional role as protector of underground coal miners and their communities. With this new alliance, the Union was forced to protect the interests of both underground miners and surface workers. These two factions often have interests diametrically opposed. Since the 1998 Bragg v. Robertson case, the Union has consistently sided with pro-MTR forces. For the Union to now say that it would not oppose an eventual ban to the practice — and will even talk to coalfield residents fighting MTR – is very significant. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. If you haven’t had the chance to read the article, please check it out: http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200804050411